Saturday, April 21, 2012

Grice’s Maxim

     In daily life a person unconsciously communicates with others in many ways such as language, gestures and expressions. In communication he/she is expected to give or share information with others. In order to make a conversation understood by the speaker and the hearer, there must be the general principle of language use, which is called the cooperative principle (Renkema, 1993: 9). The principle states that the speaker gives contribution in conversation in which the speaker is engaged. This cooperative principle contains four categories, which are formulated as basic rules or maxims. ‘Maxim is a set of norms which language users adhere to in order to uphold the effectiveness and efficiency of communication’ (Hatim and Mason, 1990: 242). Those four maxims are maxim of quantity, maxim of quality, maxim of relevance, and maxim of manner.

     Maxim of quantity demands the speaker’s contribution informative as is required and no more informative than is required. Below are the examples of an utterance that obeys the maxim of quantity and one that violates the maxim!
Example of obeying:
A: “Where are you going?”
B: “I’m going to the post office.”
In the example, B gives comments to A’s statement without adding other information
Example of disobeying / violation:
A: “Are you going to work tomorrow?”
B: “I am on jury duty, but I’ll have to go to the doctor in the evening. I have asked the manager for permission”
In this example, B’s reply violates maxim of quantity because B does not give information as required by A, i.e. yes or no. Instead, B gives more information which is not required or expected at all.

     Maxim of quality requires the speaker not to say what is believed to be false and for which the speaker lacks adequate evidence. Below are the examples of the utterance that obeys the maxim of quality and that one violates the maxim!
Example of obeying:
A: “Why did you come late last night?”
B: “The car was broken down”
In t he example, B gives the truth that his car was broken down so that he came late.
Example of disobeying / violation:
A: “The Teheran’s in Turkey, isn’t teacher?”
B: “And London’s in America I suppose.”
In the example, B’s reply is supposed to suggest that A is incorrect and B violates the maxim of quality

     Maxim of relevance required the speaker to be relevant. Below are the examples of utterance that obeys the maxim of relevance and that one violates the maxim!
Example of obeying:
A: “Where is my box of chocolates?”
B: “It is in your room.”
In the example, B’s reply relates to the question, not talking about something else. Example of disobeying / violation
A: “Where’s my box of chocolates?”
B: “I don’t know mine either.”
In the example B’s answer is not relevant to A’s question. B says something else which is not about A’s problem at all.

     Maxim of Manner requires the speaker to avoid obscurity of expression and ambiguity. Maxim of manner demands the speaker to be brief and orderly. Below are the examples of utterance that obeys the maxim of manner and that one violates the maxim!
Example of obeying:
A: Where was Alfred yesterday?
B: Alfred went to the store and bought some whiskey.
In the example, B’s answer obeys the manner maxim: be orderly, because she gives a clear explanation where A was.
Example of disobeying / violation:
A: Why was he arrested?
B: He stole the money from the bank.
In the example B’s statement is ambiguous. It can be interpreted that B didn’t steal the money which is stored in he bank. He had gone the bank first and he stole the money in another place. Another interpretation is that he stole the money stored in the bank. He got the money by robbing the bank.

     Lavinson (1983:103) stated that Grice’s maxims above specify what participants have to do in order to converse in a maximally efficient, rational, cooperative way: the participant should speak sincerely, relevantly, and clearly while providing sufficient information.

Written Discourse and Oral Discourse

     Most aspects of human life deal with language. People use it to communicate something either verbally or literally – with others. That language may be composed of one or more well-formed grammatical sentences – and indeed it often is. But it doesn’t mean that there is no “mistake in it. However, people still understand each other’s message because there is coherence in communication. Cook (1989: 4) says that coherence is a quality, which is clearly necessary for communication and for foreign language learning. However, it cannot be explained by concentrating on the internal grammar of sentences. All the sentences that hold ideas are interrelated to form a discourse. Cook (1989: 5) invents that traditionally, based on a difference production there are two kinds of discourse, namely, written discourse and oral discourse. 

     Chafe in Renkema (1993: 86) states the differences between written and oral discourse. A written discourse takes longer than speaking. The writer does not have contact with the readers, and the involvement of the writer is not as great as in oral interaction, that is why passive sentences were frequently used. However, what is going to be the main concern here is about the oral discourse. 

     Cook (1989: 8) states that oral discourse is often considered to be less planned and orderly than the written one, more open to the intervention by the receiver (more reciprocal), and less socially structured. According to Chafe in Renkema (1993: 86) the differences between oral and written discourse can also be described in terms of ‘situation’. Oral interaction is part of a shared situation which includes both speaker and listener. In such a situation, information is also clarified by gesture, posture, facial expression, intonation, etc. 

     There is some sort of oral discourse, like lesson, lectures, interviews, trials and daily conversation. Humor situation, either in real life or in humor comic, can also be put together into this group since they share the same characteristic of oral discourse, such as less planned and orderly than the written one.

Sunday, April 15, 2012

The Violated Maxims and the Illocutionary Act Types Found in the Humor Comic of Master Q

ABSTRACT


Sugiharto, Hantoro. 2004. The Violated Maxims and the Illocutionary Act Types Found in the Humor Comic of Master Q. Thesis. Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni, Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan. Universitas Katolik Widya Mandala Surabaya.

Advisors:
Drs. Hendra Tedjasuksmana, M.Hum.
V. Aniek Setiawaty, S.Pd

      Language has a very important role in people’s life. They communicate with others through language, in both direct and indirect ways. In a direct way they communicate orally, while in indirect way they express their ideas through literature such as poem, prose, play, or comic. In this study, the writer chose humor comic to be analyzed since he observed that there was something wrong in the conversation between the characters of the comic book so that it made the readers burst into laughter. Renkema (1993:9) said that there should be a cooperative between a listener and speaker in the dialogue so that the dialogue is understandable and successful. That the dialogue is understandable and successful is based on the four maxims: Maxim of Quality, Maxim of Quantity, Maxim of relevance, Maxim of Manner. Attardo (1993: 538) stated that if the speaker violates Grice’s maxim principle in a dialogue, it might be able to be a humor.
             As this is a qualitative study, the writer is interested in analyzing humor, which is taken from the comic of Master Q Millenia series number 1 to 7 and chosen based on simple random sampling, using two major theories Grice’s Maxim and Speech Act Theory and other theories such as Theory of Humor, Written and Oral Discourse, and Ambiguity theory. Comic Master Q was selected since it is the easiest access for him to do some observations and collect the data. Besides, as the writer observed, the story in this comic is adopted from daily life and the language which is used is daily language so that it can be understood easily.
            The first result indicates that the maxim which is mostly violated is maxim of Quantity (50.00%) followed by maxim of Quality (35.71%), maxim of Relevance (14.28%) and the last is maxim of Manner (00.00%).
            The second result indicates that the type of illocutionary act which mostly occurs in humor situation is Representatives (100.00%), Expressive is in the second place (14.28%), Directive is the third place (7.14%) while Commissives, Verdictives, Declaration, and Phatic are 00.00% for each.
            The third result indicates that the most reasons for being humorous are giving more or lacking information, saying false things, and not being relevant.
            The writer concludes that humor in comic Master Q at least violates one of the maxims. Furthermore, it can also be stated that the illocutionary act types which frequently appears in the humor comic of Mr. Q is Representative. It can be concluded that the characteristic of the comic of Master Q is that the speaker (in the comic) gives too much information and that information is mostly false.




Download Full Thesis : Download here..